| Back | ||||||||||
|
Forwarded
conversation
Subject: Level 1 Conduct Warning From: conductadmin@wgu.edu <conductadmin@wgu.edu> Date: Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:56 PM To: "axxxxx@my.wgu.edu" <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Cc: "joi.stirrup@wgu.edu" <joi.stirrup@wgu.edu>, "jennifer.leforce@wgu.edu" <jennifer.leforce@wgu.edu>
Dear Mr. xxxxx,
Thank you for speaking with me today about the WGU Code of Student Conduct. As a member of the WGU community you are required to interact with other students, faculty and staff in a professional manner. We expect that all future communications with affiliates of WGU will be professional in nature. This notice will serve as a Level 1 Conduct Warning for the inappropriate comments made toward your mentor on 6/16/14, and toward the Student Support Center supervisor you spoke with on 7/1/14, as well as your inappropriate comments and refusal to cooperate with the student conduct process during your interactions with the student conduct officer on 6/30/14. Subsequent violations of the WGU Code of Student Conduct will result in additional disciplinary action, which may include suspension for a specified period of time, or permanent expulsion from WGU. You can review the WGU Code of Student Conduct through the following link, and relevant sections of the code have also been copied below for your convenience: http://sh.wgu.edu/articles/ “ARTICLE III: PROSCRIBED CONDUCT Any student found to have committed or to have attempted to commit the following misconduct is subject to the disciplinary sanctions outlined in Article IV: 3. Harassment, including stalking, threatening, bullying or verbal abuse of any member of the WGU community by any means (conduct, speech, written notes, electronic mail, etc.). This includes, but is not limited to, the use of threats, profanity, demeaning or intimidating comments, pornography, and unwanted personal or sexual advances. 12. Abuse of the Student Conduct System, including but not limited to: a. Failure to obey a notice from the Student Conduct Board or WGU official to appear for a meeting or hearing as part of the Student Conduct System.” I would like to reiterate that the main goal of the code of conduct is to further the development of professional communication and behavior which will serve you in your career. We want to do everything we can to support your progress and success here at WGU. I hope that in the future we can work together, and that you will utilize appropriate communication strategies before you reach the level of frustration that was expressed in your comments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns. If there are no outstanding questions or concerns, please respond that you have received and understand the warning. Sincerely, Kumar Pandya Student Conduct Officer Western Governors University Toll-Free: 877.435.7948 x5387 Direct: 801.428.5387 kpandya@wgu.edu 
ref:_00D301GkGU._500a0kaq3Z:
---------- From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Date: Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:24 PM To: "conductadmin@wgu.edu" <conductadmin@wgu.edu>
Hi,
With all due respect sir. I want to respect your
decision and comments. However, it is not just
you at the university that has a say in this. It
also the university itself. The university has a
voice as I stated in our meeting so many times.
You need to mention that voice specifically in
your letter as I requested. " ..inappropriate
comments made towards your mentor on 6/16/14 and
toward the student support center supervisor
your spoke with on 7/1/14..."
These are new charges.
I repeat these are new accusations against me
and thus you have deviated from the original
complaint.
These are not any of the items as I asked you to
list them for our meeting. You listed two items
that I was so unfairly being accused of and of
which you could not properly reference them to
the university voice. There items were --------
"1)...difficulties communicating professionally
and productively with WGU staff, and
2) nearly constant accusations of being disrespected by staff members who have done nothing more than attempt to assist you in accordance with their job duties."
It seems to me that you cannot legally or
according to university voice find me guilty of
the original items that were originally
addressed and now you have added new ones. You
have deviated from the original accusations.
There were no inappropriate comments made
towards my mentor on 6/16/14. Our meeting was
not about the student support center supervisor
that I spoke with on 7/1/14. How it this
possible? We have spent an entire hour and a
half on issues that you could not reference to
the student code of conduct, issues that were
simply unfounded, and now you are tacking on new
issues that are quite irrelevant to our original
issues. Ok. Tell me what were the inappropriate
comments? I asked for specific, and I need
specific.
These new accusations are an example of my
original suspicions. The meeting was conducted
in a rather unprofessional manner and the
outcome with the new charges shows me that there
is definitely something wrong and we must have
someone else involved in the whole situation. As
for the other accusations of supposed "refusal
to talk to you", if you cannot find any grounds
for the original accusations, there is not
reason to charge me for the innocent unknowingly
obligation that I was being forced by the code
to meet with you. There was no notice of such
obligation from and you had ample of time, about
3 weeks that you could have notified me that
according to code I was forced to meet with you.
That is, instead of surprising me with the fact
that I could not register for my new term. There
was no need for this abrupt action. Your
explanation as you pointed in the code, is quite
inconsistent with the facts presented and have
no substance for stalling my progress at the
university by putting a hold on all my work and
continuation with the university. Furthermore,
you are holding my registration process for no
valid reason. You are abusing your power at WGU
and this is something we need to discuss we your
superiors or an item that needs to be remedied.
Since the issues were unfounded as you have
failed to list the original issues in this email
and instead came up with new ones, I need to be
free to continue with the university. With all
promises of continuing in a professional manner
and taking due process according to code when
issues arise, and which was the purpose of our
meeting as you stated to me when I asked you,
you need to allow me to proceed. Failure to
substantiate your claims means that all
accusations need to be dropped. Anything short
of that will require us to take the issue at
hand to your supervisor. Furthermore, any
further stalling of my progress at the
university will be your responsibility and I
will ask your superiors to hold you accountable
for this.
Please understand that I am trying to defend
myself from injustice from you. Our meeting was
conducted by you in an extremely unfriendly
manner. I was serious when I stated that you
were interrupting me and were not letting me
express myself or even finish my thoughts, that
"I was a grown 44 year old man so frustrated
with your unwillingness to let me speak or
finish my sentences that I was about to cry".
I will be waiting for your comments on this and
be looking forward to amicable results.
Thank you.
Regards,
xxxxx xxxxx
--
xxxxx xxxxx Student
000347383
Bachelor of Science, Accounting - January 1,
2014
Mike Ray Mentor
(213) 570-0170 Pacific
time
From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Date: Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:31 PM To: Jenifer Mutchie <jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu>
--
xxxxx xxxxx Student
000347383
Bachelor of Science, Accounting -
January 1, 2014
Mike Ray Mentor
(213) 570-0170 Pacific
time
From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Date: Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:45 PM To: Jenifer Mutchie <jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu>
Hi, I was not sure if I did the forwarding
correctly. Please review this and help me. Mr Panya
has completely came up with new items that deviate
from the original accusations. I think this is
totally unfair and that it calls for a need for
someone else to intervene. I also have done my part
in speaking with Mr Panya and have held a meeting
with him as requested by the university voice, and I
have satisfied his requested promise of dealing with
the university in a professional manner and to take
due and proper process from now on, so I don't see a
need to be restricted from proceeding with the
registration process while we figure out this new
ordeal.
---------- Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:32 AM To: "conductadmin@wgu.edu" <conductadmin@wgu.edu>, Jenifer Mutchie <jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu>
Hi, I have sent you another email in an effort to
make things more clear for all of us.
Just in case it was not made clear from my
previous email -- I received and understand the
warning but entirely disagree with all your
unfounded accusations. This warning will
eventually have to be reversed and you and the
people that are causing me this unfair and
unnecessary stress will be held accountable and
thus will have to answer to your superiors. In
the two instances, the one with Mike and the
other with this secret unmentioned customer
support supervisor, they will eventually have to
formerly answer to their employers why is it
that they think they can provide rude service to
their customers. I remember vividly what
happened on both occasions. These two men were
extremely rude and I reacted to their rudeness.
Sir, they may think that their rudeness is
justifiable but the fact still remains that they
were extremely rude and ultimately, regardless
if they were trying to help or not, they still
provided a very unpleasant, rude and demeaning
experience for the frustrated student. I live in
Los Angeles, the area where I live is called
Koreatown. As you can imagine, there are many
Koreans living here. Never before had I
experience the level of rudeness from any
culture more than from Koreans living here. It
is not about being racist or anything, it is
about explaining a concept similar to the
situations with your staff that, true, their job
their is to help the student, but have failed to
provide the level of service asked for in the
university voice. On many occasions, while I am
walking my dog, I cross the street at the wrong
places. Confession: I jaywalk. It could be
anyone driving towards me but in these cases it
so happens that these people are Korean. What do
they do? They keep going towards me as if they
are going to run me over and honk and honk. I am
in the wrong, true, because jaywalking means I
will get to my destination faster, so I jaywalk
to achieve my goal. The person that is so rudely
trying to run me over with their car is doing so
because they feel that their ability to run me
over is justifiable and thus feel that they are
in their right to do run me over legally. They
are probably thinking that if they run me over,
a judge will side with them because after-all
"xxxxx was breaking the law" by jaywalking.
Likewise, just because I am frustrated and
making mistakes of interrupting the customer
service support manager or accidentally speaking
while he is still talking does not make it
justifiable for him running me over with his
sudden outburst of "If you interrupt me one more
time, I will hang up on you!" The same thing
goes with Mike. We had a discussion about people
at the university needing to have the basic
respect for their students to notify them of
something being wrong with the grading system. I
waited a few days and the item was just still
and sitting there. I didn't think there was a
problem until I called is when I realized that
this item was not going to go anywhere until I
spoke with the course mentor. The university
automatically assumes or assumed in my case that
I knew that since this was my 4th try at the
assignment that I knew that I was supposed to
deal with my course mentor from then on. Assume
is a really bad word sometimes. Mike, just like
the customer service manager's outburst, reacted
with "...you have been sitting around the last 3
months and now you put all this motivation into
this...where was your motivation 3 months ago?"
The tone of voice used in both cases was
condescending in both instance and plenty of
rebuke. What could Mike have done differently,
let's see? What could the the manager have done
differently? Have you asked these people this? I
mean since you have become that judge that
thinks it is alright for these two individuals
to run me over because according to them I was
breaking the law.
All three people mentioned thus far, the Korean,
Mike and the Customer service manager have lost
their cool because they have felt that they are
in their right to treat me with disrespect
because after-all according to their deep
convictions "I am the one that is wrong". So
these idea of me, xxxxx, being wrong, by
either jaywalking, being lazy for 3 months when
dealing with Mike and talking out of turn before
the other person is finished as in the case with
the customer service manager, has given these
three individuals the false impression that they
can deviate from their obligation to continue
with the proper respect that is called for by
their boss (WGU) or by the driving laws as is
the case with the individuals that drive their
car close to me as if they will run me over --
you know that California law says that if a
patron is crossing the street the driver has to
stop and let them pass? It does not state that
once the patron has broken the law by
jaywalking, the driver is free to run him over.
What does WGU say about the accusations?
I have not mentioned you in all this Mr. Pandya.
You too think that running xxxxx over is
justifiable? The level of professionalism
displayed in our meeting proved to me so. You
used words or phrases such as "...your
complaints are far fetched...", "That did not
happened, I am 100% percent sure". "If you don't
do this, I will..." etc., I would like to remind
you that just because you don't use the exact
words to call someone names, it doesn't mean
that you are not calling them names. Just
because you are not using a car does not mean
that you are not running the person over. There
are all these things I have been trying to teach
you and frankly you have refused to learn (or to
answer many of my questions). Your rudeness and
lack of professionalism towards me is
unjustifiable. Especially that you have failed
to gather all the information necessary to make
a correct determination. You have acted in haste
without properly respecting the university
voice; in a sense you are failing to respect
your boss -- WGU. Remember? Be submissive to
your boss?
I hope this new information is helpful in
dealing with the new accusations Mr Pandya. I am
looking forward to meeting with you again to
discuss the new accusations and determine what
the university voice has to say about them in
this case. It helps to write things down and
plan for what you are going to discuss in all
formal meetings. I plan to give you the proper
turns to speak and try my best to not make any
"interjection" mistakes Mr. Pandya regardless if
the meeting is about you or about me.
I await your response.
Thank you.
xxxxx xxxxx Student
000347383
Bachelor of Science, Accounting -
January 1, 2014
Mike Ray Mentor
(213) 570-0170 Pacific
time
---------- From: Jenifer Mutchie <jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:38 AM To: "axxxxx@my.wgu.edu" <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Mr. xxxxx,
Thank you for your feedback. We are always trying to improve our processes, and student feedback is essential to that task. Kumar and I are in the same office so I was able to hear one side of the conversation. I appreciate the additions of your side of that conversation.
Code of Student Conduct cases can be difficult. It is a process where a student and the university may disagree regarding behavior or actions. All Code of Student Conduct cases, however, are educational in nature and intent and not judicial or legalistic proceedings. Code of Student Conduct cases are created to help us, as a university community, to uphold our standards and foster learning and growth.
Your conduct case was created after a pattern of concerning behavior was observed over time. There were attempts made to informally resolve these reports through discussion and coaching. These attempts failed thereby moving your case to a formal level.
I know that the conversation yesterday with Mr. Pandya was forceful at times and I did hear him interject to try to keep the focus on the reported issues which resulted in the formal warning. I am sorry that you felt this was unprofessional. I can assure you that Mr. Pandya strove to make the conversation as productive and relevant to the matter as possible.
At this time, this matter is resolved. We have documented that you disagree with the findings and your complaints, as well. Please continue with your studies and I hope you have success in your journey.
My best, Jenifer Mutchie
Jenifer Mutchie, M.Ed Manager of Student Services Western Governors University 4001 South 700 East, Suite 700 Salt Lake City, UT 84107 Direct (801) 428-5536 Toll Free 1 (877) 435-7948 x5536 More about WGU on NPR, NBC Nightly News, New York Times, TIME, etc.
From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu [mailto:axxxxx@my.wgu.edu] ---------- From: Conduct Admin <conductadmin@wgu.edu> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:47 AM To: "axxxxx@my.wgu.edu" <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Cc: "joi.stirrup@wgu.edu" <joi.stirrup@wgu.edu>, "jennifer.leforce@wgu.edu" <jennifer.leforce@wgu.edu>, "jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu" <jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu> Dear Mr. xxxxx, Thank you for confirming receipt and understanding of the warning. The referenced violations were indeed discussed at length during our meeting. I would be more than happy to meet with you again if you have additional information to provide, however, the warning stands, and we consider this matter closed. I have lifted the administrative hold on your account and notified your mentor that she is free to set your term enrollment. I understand you have also been in contact with my manager, Jenifer Mutchie, and I expect that you will be hearing from her again shortly in response to your additional concerns. Feel free to let me know if there is anything else I can help with. Regards, Kumar Pandya Student Conduct Officer Western Governors University Toll-Free: 877.435.7948 x5387 Direct: 801.428.5387 kpandya@wgu.edu
--------------- Original Message ---------------
From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu [axxxxx@my.wgu.edu] Sent: 7/3/2014 8:32 AM To: conductadmin@wgu.edu,jenifer. Subject: Re: Level 1 Conduct Warning
--------------- Original Message ---------------
From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu [axxxxx@my.wgu.edu] Sent: 7/2/2014 8:24 PM To: conductadmin@wgu.edu Subject: Re: Level 1 Conduct Warning From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:45 PM To: Jenifer Mutchie <jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu>
Hi,
Thank you for you last email. I understand the
matter is resolved for your office; and I
understand that these actions are a part of the
school and not legal proceedings. Never once
have I said that they were legal proceedings.
Although, I think I know where the confusion on
my knowledge of this may have started -- as I
have numerous times called these actions taken
against me "charges" instead of "accusations".
However, with everything that has transpired,
things are not resolved for me. The actions
taken regardless if they were meant as
educational or not; were sudden and abrupt and
they have affected my entire week. It really
does not concern me that Mr Pandya was
professional or not, it concerns me that someone
there can abuse their power in such manner. I
originally asked Mr Pandya to apologize to me
and he refused, I asked for Mike to apologize to
me and he has refused. I am a grown man and
grown men require that others who offend
apologize. It is common knowledge that when
someone makes a mistake that they apologize and
since the items that I was accused of were not
proven or were simple found inadequate are
considered mistakes, that I at least I receive
formal apologies from the offenders involved.
I asked you about formal complaints against your
staff and why these complaints that I have
placed against them have not escalated to the
proper departments and I have not received an
answer from you. Can you please provide me
feedback as why is this so, why the items have
not been escalated to the proper
decision-makers?
As to everything that has transpired, all the
stress and grief that your staff has caused me
does not end here for your staff but hopefully
for me. I think I have collected enough evidence
to take the legal proceedings that will make
your staff accountable for their actions. Items
include the fact that I could not register on
schedule. It sounds to me from this last email
that there is "this is an educational game were
are playing" and it is just university stuff
nothing serious attitude. Your staff has
threatened to expel me from the university due
to serious accusations that were unfounded and
not backup by university voice. This game that I
hear about in your email is a game that was only
played by your staff. I was not amused at any
time by any of the actions the university staff
has taken and thus feel that they should be held
accountable in some way.
The only reason I mentioned that Mr Pandya was
unprofessional due to the many "interjections"
and great lack of control in our meeting, is
because I thought that this would prove to you
that Mr Pandya at least owes me an apology. As I
stated before, it is not a great concern to me
if he was unprofessional. Interrupting someone
in the middle of a sentence is not an
"interjection" but simply rude especially coming
from someone that is adamantly forcefully saying
"...let me finish, you are interrupting me!" I
am not used to having formal meetings and I do
make mistakes in taking turns when speaking as
you are by now well aware of. However, upon
asking Mr Pandya about the inconsistencies of
speech interruptions, his response as
interpreted by me were that they were
deliberate. My inappropriate interjections were
innocent mishaps that I am trying so hard to
correct. However, when someone states to me that
they are deliberately committing this
inappropriateness, then my reaction is that this
person has zero business being in a position to
dictate any orders. I stated in an email to Mr
Pandya that he has no business teaching someone
else how to conduct themselves in a meetings,
since he does not know or display the proper
manners himself. This email is what made him
take this case personally and I seem to recall
that he mentioned himself as one of the people
to whom supposedly I was offensive.
There are issues there with your staff that we
need to get to the bottom of, and I don't see
any other solution than to seek legal help
outside the school. I know that some schools
have a student advocates office and I don't see
this anywhere in your university list of
services for students. Maybe I am wrong, however
I have looked, and there is nothing. If it is so
that such service is nonexistent, this again
reflects the kind of behavior displayed by the
university staff towards their students and can
be interpreted as something that is actually
encouraged by the school.
It does not help to hear that you, Mr Pandya's
superior, were in on this the whole period. This
is good information that builds in favor to my
case, though. However, if you were listening to
Mr Pandya the whole time and you being
responsible for Mr Pandya's performance, and you
letting this happen, tells me that everyone
there at the student services is the same. In
other words, Mr Pandya, called me a liar by
using the words "far fetched" and saying "that
never happened, I am 100% sure", and you were
there listening to the whole conversation and
allowing this type of improper behavior to
happen, then these make it your words as well.
Quite honestly I am disappointed to hear this. I
was assured that my meeting was only between Mr
Pandya, WGU code, and myself. Now I find out
that you were there too in the background. Not
disclosing this information is improper behavior
or at the least very unethical behavior. I asked
Mr Pandya who else was in this meeting plenty of
times to which he responded or lead me to
believe it was just him, WGU Code, and myself. I
also heard a weird sound that made me believe
the conversation was being recorded and so right
away I asked if Mr Pandya was recording the
conversation and he stated "no". I trust that he
did not record the conversation and if he did he
should provide a copy of the tape. And again
this fact additionally would also be greatly
unethical of your staff. This will all surface
eventually, if he did record our conversation
without properly letting me know, we will
eventually find out in our eventual legal
encounters with this case. Your partaking in the
meeting in the background as you say and that
you heard the entire his-side of the story
without properly disclosing this, lets me know
that your staff is capable of unethical acts
such as recording the conversation without
letting me know.
The code of conduct, the teachers code of
conduct and every procedure that the university
has in writing is there as the law that
students, staff and everyone at the university
by which they have to abide. These standards are
not there just for fun as this is the tone I
hear in your last email. This university voice
is the only thing that will guarantee fairness
to the students at WGU. The university does
indeed have a voice and that voice is in the
form of these codes. Many items are silent and
they must be voiced eventually as incidents
surge. While they are silent, the university has
no voice on the issue and therefore cannot
proceed to unfairly castigate the student as
such accusations are deemed to be unfounded.
When you tell me that the codes are there just
to help deal with situations and state that they
should be brushed off as unimportant, then that
creates an extreme level of concern for me.
Right away it screams "danger". Students at the
university are in the hands of people like Mr
Pandya and his unfair and despotic conversations
over the phone and power to disconnect without
having the proper knowledge of the facts or
with an impulse of sentimental reactions to the
situations. This is something that your
governing agency will definitely hear about
because the idea that the student codes and
other codes there are unimportant is absolutely
downright despicable. Everything has an
explanation. This explains now why Mr Pandya
according to him in our conversation, has no
idea what is a legal person. He refused to
answer that question but now I think that it was
because he simply did not know. That is quite
implausible and I am having such a hard time to
believe this because this is common knowledge,
specially for the college communities.
I have given you much opportunity to redress the
situation and it does not seem that I will find
an amicable solution to our problem within the
university departments. Therefore I will seek
legal help outside the university and hopefully
the people that I hire will help to rectify the
situation and help bring justice to this mishap
and to hold the people involved in this ordeal
accountable for their actions. Your university
staff has infringed upon my basic legal rights
and have repeatedly made unfounded accusations
on my person. The worst part of it all is that,
even upon finding that all this was in error,
your staff if unwilling to apologize for such
occurrences.
Thank you so much for your time. Please keep in
contact with me for the items that are pending.
Regards,
xxxxx xxxxx
From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:04 PM To: Conduct Admin <conductadmin@wgu.edu>
Yes, Thank you. Your unfounded accusations may stand
and your case is closed for you but not for me. I
will take the matter further. You simply cannot
issue a warning for items that your failed to
reference to your university voice. The university
voice is silent regarding most of your un-founded
allegations/accusation and you proved this in your
last email by switching the items discussed and even
issuing a new one. I was surprised and happy that
you made this blunder because this just proves the
extremity of your error. It is like saying "Student,
you did not do anything wrong because we were not
able to prove it, but we will still issue the
warning".
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
xxxxx
From: conductadmin@wgu.edu <conductadmin@wgu.edu> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:37 PM To: "axxxxx@my.wgu.edu" <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Cc: "joi.stirrup@wgu.edu" <joi.stirrup@wgu.edu>, "jennifer.leforce@wgu.edu" <jennifer.leforce@wgu.edu>, "jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu" <jenifer.mutchie@wgu.edu>
Dear Mr. xxxxx,
I'm very sorry to hear that you still do not understand why your behavior resulted in a conduct warning, but I wish you the best of luck in all your endeavors. Regards, Kumar Pandya Student Conduct Officer
Western Governors University
Toll-Free: 877.435.7948 x5387 Direct: 801.428.5387 kpandya@wgu.edu --------------- Original Message --------------- From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu [axxxxx@my.wgu.edu]
Hi, We can keep going at this. I understand that you
have acted in haste, that your accusations were
unfounded and were not according to code. I
understand that you have abused your power at the
university. As I stated before I have done nothing
wrong and I have never stated or confessed that I
have. There seems to be a confusion. Why would I
confess to something for which I am completely not
at fault. You were not able to prove or you failed
to show me in the university voice how it was that I
misbehaved. I agreed to continue my communications
at a professional level even if the university staff
does the contrary, and to take due process in any of
my complaints. The level of friendliness and
professionalism in dealing with students by you and
your staff leaves a lot to wish for. I never, at any
time said the complaints will stop. You need to
understand that I have rights and those rights,
those basic rights must be acknowledged and
respected. If you are going to accuse me of
something, you need to back it up with proof. Where
is the proof that I have misbehaved? If you are
going to continue the emails, please at least answer
my questions. I acted according to code. I wish you
and others there at the university would do the
same. You applied one of your accusations, the one
about refusing to speak with you after being
requested to do so, according to code and you relied
on this code to apply it. Why is is that you did not
act according to code for the other accusations? I
do expect an answer please. Those other accusations
are nowhere to be found in the school code. What is
your defense for this? According to Jenifer Mutchie,
the code is there for your convenience and your
staff takes from the code as you see fit. That
sounds extremely familiar with the best selling book
in the world. People take what is convenient for
them and toss out what is not convenient or with
what they don't agree. Your capacity to make
decisions as far as punishment for your student is
restricted by the university voice and I will take
up this issue with you or with your superiors until
you realize that taking only what is convenient from
the university code is ethically and morally wrong.
You acted in contrary to university code. This here
is an unfinished project and it will not be complete
until the end result reaches a level of satisfaction
for me. I contacted Ms Jenifer Mutchie and escalated
the issue to her in an effort and hope that she
would see the short-comings on your part regarding
the code but she also feels as you do and this is
very understandable. In her capacity, she is
responsible for your mistakes. I will continue to
escalate the issue until I have ousted my options if
no sensible decision has been reached, I will be be
forced to seek legal help outside the university.
Thus far making a decision on your part in contrary
to school code does not seem to be a sensible
decision for me. I am at work with this and have
also considered the option to seek legal help
outside the school and seek clearance for damages
committed.
Also, there seems to be a hidden message is your
email. I heard it too many times already, to
many you have tried to hint at it. It is also
right here in one of your accusations, you
remember the initial accusations that you had?
This one:
2) "...nearly constant accusations of being
disrespected by staff members who have done
nothing more than attempt to assist you in
accordance with their job duties."
The hidden message in your email, the message
that you are not stating to me directly for fear
of I don't know what, is that I cannot place a
complaint with the school about your staff
members and that if I do, you will take the
staff side. You have so far taken their side.
Your decisions are biased. You have proven it a
few times already and have even used certain
words to prove it to me. quote: "...that did not
happen, I am 100% confident." and again quote:
"...that is far fetched....".
You are going to tell me that a sensible person
is not going to see that these kind of comments
are biased? Please, please if you are going to
keep responding to my emails, answer my
questions.
I don't honestly want to keep reacting to your
emails. I called it harassment before when you
were sending them to me. It was in a sense
harassment because you kept doing it even though
I asked you to stop. Let's say you did this for
a month and you would not stop even though I ask
you, you sir were guilty of harassment because
you were not letting me know what capacity you
had in sending these emails. Your duty was to
let me know that it was according to code and
that I was obligated to meet with you. Your duty
was to either do that or to transfer me to
another staff member that could explain to me
the code that obligates me to comply. Instead
you took very unfriendly and significantly
consequential actions that would ultimately
degenerate my well being. I am worried at the
moment and waiting for the aftermath of your
aggressive actions. I will tally the results and
continue to take action and eventually seek
legal advice for compensation from you and the
people responsible for the harm on my person
which will include every possible iniquity
committed by you and your organization.
I am ready and expect your emails as long as
they are done in a professional fashion. If you
take the liberty to reply please reply with
answer to the questions. Other emails have
questions in them and you have failed to answer
these as expected. It only makes sense that if
someone asks you something, you should answer.
Thank you.
From: axxxxx@my.wgu.edu <axxxxx@my.wgu.edu> Date: Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 9:31 PM To: "conductadmin@wgu.edu" <conductadmin@wgu.edu>  |
|||||||||
