Federal Tax Ethics |
||||||
|
||||||
Table of Contents |
||||||
Ethics or regulations? Do Unto Others? Write It Down IRS has Rules That Govern Ethics Continuing Tax Education Tax Related Identity Theft Safeguarding Taxpayer Data More Rules On Tax Practitioners Best Practice Tell Your Client There is a Problem Overview and Expiration of ITINs Preparer Penalties Due Diligence in Tax Preparation E-File Requirements Annual Filing Season Program Requirements Consent to Circular 230 Rules Limited Representation Rights More On Unenrolled Preparers Power of Attorney |
||||||
3. Federal Tax Ethics |
||||||
Ethics or regulations? This ethics course mainly contains concepts regarding the recognition of an attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agents, and other persons representing taxpayers before the IRS. Ethics in this sense is more concerned with regulations such as rules relating to the authority to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, the duties and restrictions relating to such practice, prescription of sanctions for violating the regulations, the rules applicable to disciplinary proceedings and the availability of official records. Usually attorneys, CPAs, enrolled agents, and enrolled actuaries can represent taxpayers before the IRS. Under special circumstances, other individuals, including un-enrolled tax return preparers can assist taxpayers on tax matters. Special forms need to be filed to authorize individuals or certain entities to receive and inspect a taxpayer's confidential tax information. In addition, the following information is great for understanding what ethics is. We need to strive to be ethical. The more you learn about ethics, the more you will see that being 100 percent ethical in this world is merely impossible. What is extremely wrong to one individual is perfectly fine to the other individual. Do unto others "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". Seriously? The golden rule? This rule seems to be more like the "It is ok to do anything to others". Then you need to determine who "others" is. Is it others like me? Would others include animals and other creatures? So according to this rule, it would be alright to be slowly roasted over an open frame. Oh, so this only means "Do unto others (humans like me) as you would have them do unto you"? We can continue to interpret this rule as we wish. We have been doing this for centuries. We can include it in our religious literature and use it for centuries to hurt others. Others have only included "Others like me". What other explanation could there be for these foreigners to come to our land, call it their own, enslave us and force us to convert to their ways? At one time "Others" only included certain people who possessed the power better known as gun powder to force their will upon others. Now we celebrate their triumphs on special legal holidays such as Thanksgiving, Christmas, Independence day etc. Many disguise these so called holidays as "time to spend with family". Does "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" mean that you can force feed geese and ducks until their liver explodes in order for you to have an exquisite serving of foie gras? Or does "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" mean tying up a new born calf and freeze its movements so that the meat remains tender and then killing the baby calf when it is two or three months old to get the best veal? Apparently the younger the baby calf, the better the meat tastes! These acts are all legal. You can do anything to an animal because animals are considered property. The question is: Is it ethical? Please don't use "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" or "The Golden Rule" as your measurement of how good you are. If you call me and tell me that this is your measurement of how good you are, I will yell at you. Ethics is one thing and legal is another. Sometimes they come hand in hand. For instance, the person that constantly breaks the law is not considered an ethical person. Laws are derived from ethics. Something must first be considered unethical or wrong before it becomes illegal. There is also the person who never breaks the law but does all sorts of unethical things. For this reason, ethics becomes a very complicated concept to understand. Sometimes we cannot tell is something is unethical since there are no laws that prohibit such an act. Many times, as is the case with foie gras and veal, ethics is a matter of personal conviction. I don't eat foie gras or veal because I know the torture these animals are put through in the manufacture of such. I also only eat eggs from cage free hens. I don't eat at fast food places because I know the little regard for animal life at the farms that produce the meats for these fast food places. I honestly think that fast food places such as McDonalds should disappear from the face of the earth. They are killing and torturing innocent creatures for profit. Come on! You too can be like Bolivia, Yemen, Iceland, Bermuda, Kazakhstan, Macedonia, Ghana, Zimbabwe, Montenegro and ban McDonalds from your country. Your country starts with you. Therefore, if you ban McDonalds from your life and enough people do the same, McDonald's will disappear. It is a shame that we don't ban McDonald's from the United States. McDonald's and none of these fast food places are breaking the law. They offer jobs and boast about their food production and how they are able to manufacture cheap and unhealthy food for the masses. I've had an opportunity to see the clientele that these fast food places cater to. McDonald's has excellent internet service. Therefore, when my internet broke down, I was at McDonald's to use their internet. Needless to say, I eventually was asked to leave since I never purchased anything. Ok. Back to their unhealthy clientele. Let me sum it up this way - McDonald's customers are overweight, yellowish and very unhealthy looking. In this course we are more mainly concerned with the tax laws and not breaking the rules when it pertains to these tax laws. Practitioners who don't follow the rules are considered unethical. Also, if the practitioner were to find gray areas in the tax law, he or she would be considered unethical. If a practitioner uses gray areas in the tax law to help his clients, he or she would be performing classical unethical acts. If the practitioner is breaking the law, this would not be too much an issue of ethics but more of an issue of crime. The individual breaking the law is not really "unethical" but rather "a criminal". There are many criminals in the world, but many more unethical people. Likewise, there are many practitioners who break the law and who pay the price by getting arrested and losing their license to practice or both. However, there are many more unethical preparers who never get in trouble for anything they do because they are within the legal constraints. Wait! I was not done with McDonald's yet. McDonald's is not breaking the law when McDonald's tortures its farm animals. The laws against animal cruelty that protect dogs and cats do not apply to farm animals. This fact is a loophole for McDonald's and it saves them tons of money! Tortured animals are easier to handle. It is a whole lot easier and cheaper to gather a whole bunch of chickens in a room and to crush them than to hire employees to kill one at a time. Then after that the chickens are put on an electronic machine to pluck them with rubber pluckers. Some of these chickens which survived the crushing are then put through a horrifying plucking experience. Cattle are put through a similar horrifying torture. Do your own research. Next, think about this when you are enjoying chicken nuggets or that cheeseburger. You can find tons of information online! Don't eat at McDonald's and similar fast food places. Legally they are angels who don't hurt a fly, but ethically they are horrible monsters who eat their pray alive! The reason I mention McDonald's is because they are a prime example of unethical behavior especially when it comes to the treatment of animals. They are extremely unethical but they cannot get in trouble legally for their wrongdoing. I am loud about their mistreatment of animals because that is one of the unethical things that they do that really agitates me! Write it down If everything that is unethical was written down as being wrong, then the science of ethics would disappear. There would not be such a thing as ethics. In a sense, anything that is wrong and there is no law that prohibits it, is a matter of ethics. If you break ethics rules, you are unethical and you most probably will not go to jail for that. However, if you break legal rules, you are a criminal and it will most probably land you in jail eventually. Remember President George W. Bush? It was all over the news. Many government employees were committing crimes and instead of charging them for the crimes, he sent them to school to learn ethics. It is understandable, since during his presidency, he was an extremely unethical man himself. What about NBC permitting George W. Bush be interviewed regarding his new found hobby and his paintings of kitties? That was quite unethical of NBC if you ask me! IRS has Rules that govern ethics The practitioner must use reasonable efforts to identify and ascertain the facts, which may relate to future events if a transaction is prospective, and to determine which facts are relevant. The practitioner can never base an opinion on any unreasonable factual assumptions, even assumptions as to future events. Furthermore, the practitioner cannot base an opinion on any unreasonable factual representations, statements or findings of the taxpayers or any other person. It would also not be reasonable for a practitioner to rely on a projection, financial forecast or appraisal if the practitioner knows or should know that it is incorrect or incomplete or was prepared by a person lacking skills or qualifications. Any practitioner who has principal authority and responsibility for overseeing a firm's practice of providing advice concerning federal tax issues must take reasonable steps to ensure that the firm has adequate procedures in effect for all members, associates, and employees. Any such practitioner will be subject to discipline for failing to comply with the requirements if the practitioner knows or should know that one or more individuals that don't comply with section 10.35 and the practitioner fails to take prompt action to correct the noncompliance. The Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate, after notice and an opportunity for a proceeding, may censure, suspend, or disbar any practitioner from practice before the Internal Revenue Service if the practitioner is shown to be incompetent or disreputable. Additionally, this would also apply if the practitioner fails to comply with any regulation under the prohibited conduct standards or acts with intent to defraud. The Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate may also censure, suspend, or disbar any practitioner from practice if the practitioner willfully and knowingly misleads or threatens a client or prospective client. You may be wondering what is considered incompetent or disreputable conduct. Incompetent or disreputable conduct for which a practitioner may be sanctioned includes contemptuous conduct in connection with the practice before the Internal Revenue Service, including the use of abusive language or making false accusations or statements, knowing them to be false. This type of conduct would also include willfully disclosing or otherwise using a tax return or tax return information in a manner which is not authorized by the Internal Revenue Service. Also if you fail to sign a tax return when the practitioner's signature is required by the federal tax laws, would be misconduct. It goes without saying that that it would be misconduct of your part to give false or misleading information that you know to be false or misleading to the Department of the Treasury or any officer or employee thereof, or to any tribunal authorized to pass upon federal tax matters. When you file a complaint, it would be sufficient to just fairly inform the respondent of the charges brought so that the respondent is able to prepare a defense. It is such a relief that filing a complaint with the IRS both as a practitioner or as taxpayer does not involve filing so much legal complicated paperwork like when filing a lawsuit. To maintain active enrollment to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, each individual is required to have the enrollment renewed. The effective date of renewal is the first day of the fourth month following the close of the period for renewal. You don't have to wait to receive notification from the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility of the renewal requirement. You are required to renew regardless if your renewal notification was not received, gets lost in the mail or the Director decided not to send such notification. Continuing tax education To qualify for continuing tax education credit for an enrolled agent, a course of learning must be a qualifying program designed to enhance professional knowledge in federal taxation or federal taxation related matters. The qualifying tax education program must be a qualifying program consistent with the Internal Revenue Code and effective tax administration. This tax education must be administered by a qualifying sponsor of tax education. Individuals can lose their eligibility to practice before the IRS by not meeting the requirements for renewal of enrollment such as when the individual fails to comply with the continuing tax professional education requirements. The practitioner can also request to be placed in an inactive retirement status. Furthermore, individual can lose their eligibility to practice before the Internal Revenue Service by being suspended or disbarred by state authorities to practice as an attorney or certified public accountant. Each individual applying for renewal of their EA enrollment must retain for a period of four years following the date of renewal of enrollment the information required with regard to qualifying continuing professional education hours. Such information may include the name of the sponsoring organization, the location, title and description of the content of the program. However, this information may not include the publisher information of the study material used. |
||||||
Tax-related identity theft | ||||||
Identity theft occurs when someone uses your personal
information, such as your name, Social Security number (SSN), or other
identifying information, without your permission, to commit fraud or
other crimes such as getting a job or filing a tax return to receive a
refund. To reduce your risk, protect your SSN, ensure your employer is protecting your SSN
and be careful when choosing a tax preparer. You know that your clients
will be careful when they choose their tax preparer. Therefore, you must
always make your clients comfortable with your trust. Your clients must
know that you safeguard their information and that they can trust you with
this information. The security lock companies have done a great job at
instilling fear in people by highly advertising their services to the
public. As a result of this, taxpayers are very careful about trusting the
right individuals with their identity such as social security and credit
card numbers.
|
||||||
Safeguarding Taxpayer Data | ||||||
You must adhere to your promise of protecting
your client. A client of a professional person or organization is a person or
company that received a service from them in return for payment. That is
really nice, really defined information about what a client is. However, a person
dependent on another, as for protection or patronage is another definition of
client. If you go with the latter definition, you will have satisfied the first
and also your obligation towards your client when he or she walks into your
office. You will also use the later definition when you safeguard your client's
data.
You will safeguard your client's taxpayer data as if you were safeguarding your own. Just like you would not like someone else to get a hold of your personal information, you should not give any opportunity for anyone to get a hold of your client's information. The worst enemy for your taxpayer data, nowadays are identity thieves. These people will have their tax returns prepared by you in order to try to get information on your clients that you inadvertently place on your desk. These people will come up with fake W-2's and pretend they are your client and prepare their taxes with you in order to get copies of your client's tax return and other personal information such a social security numbers, dates of birth, address and other personal information. Think about, your client walks in, do you know all of your clients personally? Do you make sure that the client is the client or do you just vaguely try to remember them? Safeguarding your client's taxpayer information should include you asking for ID. Computer data breaches are a whole different world, and that as well, you must make sure everything that has to do with the internet and your computer is well in order and that protections are in place for you to safeguard your client's taxpayer data information. It is your legal responsibility as a tax professional, together with other agencies to put safeguards in place to protect taxpayer information to proven fraud and identity theft. This will in turn enhance customer confidence and trust. A few things to consider, even the most basic one that is mentioned above about asking for identification from all your clients can help you safeguard your client's most personal information.
You may be subject to the Gram-m-Leach Bliley Act (GLB Act) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Financial Privacy and Safeguards rules. Even if you are not subject to the rules under these laws, you should consider implementing their procedures and best practices to safeguard your client's taxpayer information. You as a tax professional are defined under the FTC as a financial institution mainly because when you deal with taxpayer information, you are also indirectly dealing with their financial information which is used by many financial institutions. At least you should follow best practices in handling taxpayer information.
Very basic items like asking for ID from every client in order to prevent anyone from posing as a client and taking that client's personal information should be in place. You should always make sure doors are locked so no physical breaches will occur. Always require passwords to computer programs and make sure that whoever has access should have access. Make sure all electronically stored data is encrypted and always keep backups for recovery purposes. Always, always shred into tiny pieces of paper that contain taxpayer information before throwing that paper in the trash. Lastly, you should probably never email taxpayer sensitive personal information. You knew when you got into this business that you will be dealing with very personal taxpayer information. You must take every measure to ensure that your taxpayer data is safe. Make sure your building is not easily breachable. You should always ask for your client's identification to make sure your client is who he or she is claiming to be. You can make this a blanket request of everyone and this way this will become second nature for your entire operation. You can pretend that to get access to the taxpayer data now or later when they come back another time, you must input their ID number in the system. You can even do this from family and friends. This may sound absurd at first, but your company will acquire a reputation for taking identity theft seriously. When people talk about your business and the services you provide, they will for sure talk about the fact that you ask for ID and this way criminals will stay away. |
||||||
More rules on tax practitioners | ||||||
A practitioner may never take acknowledgments, administer oaths, certify papers, or perform official acts as a notary public with respect to any matter administered by the Internal Revenue Service. A practitioner shall not represent a client before the Internal Revenue Service if the representation involves a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest exists if the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client. If there is no significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the practitioner's responsibility to another client, a former client or a third person, or by a personal interest of the practitioner then there is no conflict of interest. I don't think any conflict of interest is prohibited by law and as long as each affected client waives the conflict of interest by giving informed consent, the practitioner can represent the client before the Internal Revenue Service. A practitioner may not take acknowledgements, administer oaths, certify papers, or perform official acts as a notary public with respect to any matter administered by the Internal Revenue Service. A practitioner cannot represent a client before the Internal Revenue Service if the representation involves a conflict of interest. If there is no significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the practitioner's responsibility to another client, a former client or a third person, or by a personal interest of the practitioner then there is no conflict of interest. |
||||||
Best Practice | ||||||
There are so many definitions of the word client. You can think
about it as the definition we all think about - a client is a person who gets
services in exchange for a fee or money. However, there is another definition of client that is most important for the professional accountant or lawyer or service provider if you will. This definition is "a person dependent on another, as for protection or patronage". Does that mean that our kids are also clients? You better believe it! Our children most definitely fit the definition of client and so do the people who step into our offices seeking professional tax and accounting services. We really should post this on our walls "You are our client and we will protect you." Tax advisors should provide clients with the highest quality representation and protection concerning federal tax issues by adhering to best practices in providing advice and in preparing or assisting in the preparation of a submission to the Internal Revenue Service. Best practice includes establishing the facts, determining which facts are relevant, evaluating the reasonableness of any assumptions or representations, relating the applicable law to the relevant facts, and arriving at a conclusion supported by the law and the facts. Simply advising a client to take a position on a document, affidavit or other paper submitted to the Internal Revenue service would not be a best practice action. It would also not be a best practice for the practitioner to advise a client to submit a document, affidavit or other paper to the Internal Revenue Service if such impedes the administration of the federal tax laws. Neither would it be proper conduct to advise your clients to do anything necessary to avoid the payment of tax at all cost. A best practice would be to represent your client in a legal and ethical manner and this means following the tax laws and avoiding tax loopholes. After all, tax dollars benefit everyone. |
||||||
In cases where any part of the understatement of the tax liability is due to a willful attempt by the return preparer to understate the liability, or if the understatement is due to reckless or intentional disregard of the rules or regulations by the tax preparer, the preparer is subject to the greater of $5,000 or 50% of income derived or to be derived from the misconduct. A penalty will not be imposed on any part of an underpayment if there was reasonable cause for your position and you acted in good faith in taking that position. However, if you failed to keep proper books and records or failed to substantiate items properly, you should just pay the preparer penalty because you will not be able to avoid the penalty by disclosure. | ||||||
Many un-enrolled individuals can represent the specific taxpayers before the IRS, provided this individual presents satisfactory identification. You family member can represent you before the Internal Revenue Service. The officer of the corporation can represent the corporation before the IRS. Additionally, any employee can represent the employer before the Internal Revenue Service. In general, individuals who are not eligible or who have lost the privilege as a result of certain actions cannot practice before the IRS. If an individual loses eligibility to practice, his or her power of attorney will not be recognized by the Internal Revenue Service. Out of courtesy, the Internal Revenue Service will most likely send the individual, his client or both a letter notifying them of such non-recognition. | ||||||
Being convicted of any criminal offense under the revenue laws or of any offense involving dishonesty or breach of trust is considered disreputable conduct. The Office of Professional Responsibility presides over a hearing on a complaint for disbarment based on a violation of the laws or regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service. For example, as for negotiation of taxpayer refund checks, practitioners who are unenrolled income tax return preparers must never endorse or otherwise cash any refund checks issued to the taxpayer. Don't engage in disreputable conduct. Any individual engaged in limited practice before the IRS who is involved in disreputable conduct may be disbarred, suspended, or censured. | ||||||
Tell your client there is a problem | ||||||
A practitioner who knows that his or her client has not complied with the revenue laws or has made an error or omission in any return, has the responsibility to advise the client promptly of the noncompliance. Every practitioner also has the responsibility to advise the client of the consequences of any noncompliance. Any unenrolled preparer who knows that the client has not complied with the revenue laws, or that the client has made an error in or omission from any return, document, affidavit, or other paper that the client is required by law to execute, shall advise the client promptly of the fact of the noncompliance, error or omission. | ||||||
Overview and expiration of Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) | ||||||
Significant changes were made to the Individual
Identification Number (ITIN) Program. ITINs were authorized under Section 6109
in addition to requesting the information need to issue these numbers. An ITIN
is needed in order for a taxpayer to meet the social security requirements for
U.S. tax purposes. The taxpayer who is issued an ITIN is usually not eligible to
receive a social security number from the Social Security Administration. These
people are usually not eligible for an SSN.
The PATH Act has made changes to the ITIN program. Most taxpayers must submit their Form W-7 with the tax return for which the ITIN is needed. The application Form W-7 is submitted by both domestic and foreign applicants. Original documents or certified copies of documents are the only acceptable documentation, except for a few limited reasons. Under the PATH Act, any ITIN that is not used on a federal tax return for three consecutive tax years, be a dependent or an individual filing a tax return, will expire on December 31st of the third consecutive year of nonuse. For example, if the individual does not file or is not claimed as a dependent on a tax return in 2016, 2017, and 2018, the ITIN will expire on December 31, 2018. This rule applies to all ITINs regardless on when it was issued. The PATH Act has a schedule of when ITINs will expire unless they have already expired for the three year nonuse. For example,
If your ITIN expires be it for the three year nonuse or because one of the above timeframes apply, you will need to reapply by submitting a new Form W-7 and supply the required documentation to prove your identity. Taxpayers should make sure to check "renewal" to make the process flow easier. The new thing this time around is that these individual will not have to attach a tax return to their Form W-7 to renew their ITIN. |
||||||
Preparer penalties | ||||||
A penalty may be imposed on a return preparer who endorses or negotiates a
refund check issued to any taxpayer other than the return preparer. The amounts
can add up since there is a penalty of $520 for each check endorsed. The
prohibition on return preparers negotiating a refund check is limited to a
refund check for return they prepared. Preparer penalties may be asserted against an individual or firm meeting the definition of a tax preparer under I.R.C. §7701(a)(36) and Treas. Reg. §301.7701-15. Preparer penalties that may be asserted under appropriate circumstances include, but are not limited to, those set forth in I.R.C. §§ 6694, 6695, 6701 and 6713. Under §301.7701-15(c), Providers are not tax return preparers for the purpose of assessing most preparer penalties as long as their services are limited to "typing, reproduction or other mechanical assistance in the preparation of a return or claim for refund". If an ERO, Intermediate Service Provider, Transmitter or the product of a Software Developer alters the return information in a non-substantive way, this alteration is considered to come under the "mechanical assistance" exception described in §301.7701-15(c). A non-substantive change is a correction or change limited to a transposition error, misplaced entry, spelling error or arithmetic correction. If an ERO, Intermediate Service Provider, Transmitter or the product of a Software Developer alters the return in a way that does not come under the "mechanical assistance" exception, the IRS may hold the Provider liable for income tax return preparer penalties. See Treas. Reg.§301.7701-15(c); Rev. Rul. 85-189, 1985-2 C.B. 341 (which describes a situation where the Software Developer was determined to be an tax return preparer and subject to certain preparer penalties). A $5 20 penalty may be imposed, per I.R.C. §6695(f), on a return preparer who endorses or negotiates a refund check issued to any taxpayer other than the return preparer. The prohibition on return preparers negotiating a refund check is limited to a refund check for returns they prepared.A preparer that is also a financial institution, but has not made a loan to the taxpayer on the basis of the taxpayer’s anticipated refund, may cash a refund check and remit all of the cash to the taxpayer, accept a refund check for deposit in full to a taxpayer’s account provided the bank does not initially endorse or negotiate the check, or endorse a refund check for deposit in full to a taxpayer’s account pursuant to a written authorization of the taxpayer. A preparer bank may also subsequently endorse or negotiate a refund check as part of the check-clearing process through the financial system after initial endorsement. Under Treas. Reg. 1.6695-1(f), a tax preparer, however, may affix the taxpayer's name to a check for the purpose of depositing the check into the account in the name of the taxpayer or in joint names of the taxpayer and one or more persons (excluding the tax return preparer) if authorized by the taxpayer or the taxpayer's recognized representative. The IRS may sanction any income tax return preparer that violates this provision. In addition, the IRS reserves the right to assert all appropriate preparer and non-preparer penalties against a Provider as warranted. Providers are not tax return preparers for the purpose of assessing most preparer penalties as long as their services are limited to "typing, reproduction or other mechanical assistance in the preparation of a return or claim of refund". If an ERO, Intermediate Service Provider, Transmitter or the product of a Software Developer alters the return in a way that does not come under the "mechanical assistance" exception, the IRS may hold the Provider liable for income tax return preparer penalties. The return preparer penalties under IRC 6695 are assessed against preparers who: * Fail to provide the taxpayer with a copy of the return, $50 per failure, up to a maximum of $26,000 for each calendar year; per IRC 6695(a),* Fail to sign the return, $50 per failure, up to a maximum of $2 6,000 for each calendar year, per IRC 6695(b),* Fail to provide an identifying number, $50 per failure, up to a maximum of $2 6,000 for each calendar year; per IRC 6695(c),* Fail to retain a copy of the return or a list of returns prepared, $50 per failure, up to a maximum of $2 6,000 for each return period, per IRC 6695(d),* Fail to file a tax return preparer information return or set forth an item in the return as required under IRC 6060, $50 for each failure, up to a maximum of $2 6,000 for each return period, per IRC 6695(e),* Negotiate a refund check or misappropriate a refund via electronic means, $5 20 per failure per IRC 6695(f), or* Fail to be diligent in determining eligibility for the Earned Income Tax Credit, $5 20 per failure per IRC 6695(g). |